In The Promise of
Happiness Sara Ahmed examines the connection between our conception of
happiness and what constitutes the “good life.” She argues that certain ideas
and objects, for instance, marriage, family, and heterosexual intimacy, are
perceived as “happy objects” that contain the promise of future happiness.
These objects, Ahmed reveals, exist even in “the absence of happiness by
filling a certain gap; we anticipate that the object will cause happiness, such
that it becomes a prop that sustains the fantasy that happiness is what would
follow if only we could have ‘it’” (32). For her, these happy objects embody
the good life; they demarcate the kind of life we should strive for, such that
happiness becomes tied to acquiring the right or proper objects and unhappiness
to anything that deviates from this norm. Ahmed’s research deals precisely with
those individuals and groups that are figured as deviant because they are
already perceived as unhappy and/or attempt to seek happiness in unexpected
objects; by concentrating her study around figures such as the “feminist
killjoy, unhappy queer, and melancholic migrant,” she conveys the necessity of
dissociating our conception of happiness from what is unquestionably “good” and
examines the “‘unhappy archives’” each figure embodies as a way of illuminating
alternative modes of living (17).