In The Semblance of Identity Christopher
Lee examines the ongoing debate in Asian American studies over identity
politics and its political efficacy; he claims that rather than presenting “an
argument for or against identity and identity politics,” his “aim is to explore
the consequences of the ‘post-identity’ turn” (3). Lee approaches the issue of
identity (and post-identity) in Asian American studies by tracing what he
describes as “the ‘idealized critical subject,’” a figure that “operates throughout
Asian American literary culture and cultural criticism as a means of providing
coherence to oppositional knowledge projects and political practices” (4). By working
through Theodor Adorno’s conception of “aesthetic semblance” as “the kinds of
knowledge that artworks offer by virtue of their appearance and illusory
coherence,” Lee establishes a parallel between aesthetics and identity (17). He
tracks the idealized critical subject as an aesthetic figure that manifests in
Asian American literary productions and demonstrates in the unraveling of the
form and content of these texts the “theoretical structures of race and
identity” (17). Ultimately, while Lee’s work does demonstrate how
representations of Asian American identity have always been unstable, his focus
on the idealized critical subject reveals how despite its flaws, identitarian thinking
continues to persist even amidst the proliferation of anti- and post-identity
discourses.
Showing posts with label aesthetics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aesthetics. Show all posts
Friday, August 3, 2012
Theory Review: Lee's Semblance of Identity (2012)
Lee, Christopher. The Semblance of Identity: Aesthetic
Mediation in Asian American Literature. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2012.
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Theory Review: Berlant's Cruel Optimism (2011)
Berlant, Lauren. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke UP, 2011.
In Cruel Optimism Lauren Berlant reveals that
despite deteriorating social, economic, and environmental conditions, people
still remain attached to fantasies of the "good life"; her research examines
how such fantasies have survived even when conditions for survival are
increasingly compromised under postwar neoliberal restructuring. She
posits “cruel optimism” as a relational dynamic whereby individuals remain
attached to “compromised conditions of possibility” or “clusters of promises”
embedded in desired object-ideas even when they inhibit the conditions for
flourishing and fulfilling such promises (24, 23). For Berlant, optimism is a
formal or structural feeling, such that an “optimistic attachment is invested
in one’s own or the world’s continuity, but might feel any number of ways,” including not optimistic at all (13).
In other words, maintaining attachments that sustain the good life fantasy, no
matter how injurious or cruel these attachments may be, allows people to make
it through day-to-day life when the day-to-day has become unlivable. Berlant is
essentially concerned with conditions of living or the state of the “present,”
which she describes as structured through “crisis ordinariness,” and turns to
affect and aesthetics as a way of apprehending these crises; by tracking the
various impasses we face today, she suggests that it becomes possible to
recognize that certain “genres” are no longer sustainable in the present and
that new emergent aesthetic forms are taking hold, alternative genres that
allow us to recognize modes of living not rooted in normative good life
fantasies.
In Cruel Optimism Lauren Berlant reveals that
despite deteriorating social, economic, and environmental conditions, people
still remain attached to fantasies of the "good life"; her research examines
how such fantasies have survived even when conditions for survival are
increasingly compromised under postwar neoliberal restructuring. She
posits “cruel optimism” as a relational dynamic whereby individuals remain
attached to “compromised conditions of possibility” or “clusters of promises”
embedded in desired object-ideas even when they inhibit the conditions for
flourishing and fulfilling such promises (24, 23). For Berlant, optimism is a
formal or structural feeling, such that an “optimistic attachment is invested
in one’s own or the world’s continuity, but might feel any number of ways,” including not optimistic at all (13).
In other words, maintaining attachments that sustain the good life fantasy, no
matter how injurious or cruel these attachments may be, allows people to make
it through day-to-day life when the day-to-day has become unlivable. Berlant is
essentially concerned with conditions of living or the state of the “present,”
which she describes as structured through “crisis ordinariness,” and turns to
affect and aesthetics as a way of apprehending these crises; by tracking the
various impasses we face today, she suggests that it becomes possible to
recognize that certain “genres” are no longer sustainable in the present and
that new emergent aesthetic forms are taking hold, alternative genres that
allow us to recognize modes of living not rooted in normative good life
fantasies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
